Standard Bank Loch Logan, Thoriso Marvin Mosikili, Ashley Youngman and Emily
Court order seizes property linked to crime · Published 2023-03-17 · What is a POCA?
- Party
- Standard Bank Loch Logan, Thoriso Marvin Mosikili, Ashley Youngman and Emily
- ID / Reg no
- 2001/010280/23
Case
- Court
- Mpumalanga Division, Mbombela (Main seat
Parties addressed
- Standard Bank Loch Logan, Thoriso Marvin Mosikili, Ashley Youngman and Emily
Identifiers
- Cash amount
- R703 600
- Company regs
- 2001/010280/23, 2019/486388/07, 2011/119689/07
From the gazette
Preservation Order Notice
Notice in terms of section 39 of the Prevention of Organised Crime Act 121 of 1998 (POCA)
This notice is addressed to Standard Bank Loch Logan, Thoriso Marvin Mosikili, Ashley Youngman and Emily
Mthimkhulu and all other persons who may have an interest in amount of R703 600 (cash) and the Mercedes Benz
with registration numbers DK31PMGP, chassis numbers WDD1173462N141337 and engine numbers
27092030507199 (the vehicle), both the cash and the vehicle to be referred to as the property:
Take notice that:
1 The National Director of Public Prosecutions (National Director) has obtained a preservation of property order
(the order), a copy of which is attached to this notice, in terms of section 38(2) of the POCA in respect of the
property.
2 If you have an interest in the property, you should understand that it is now at risk. You are advised to obtain
legal advice on whether your interest can be protected and, if so, on how to protect it.
3 You are notified that the National Director of Public Prosecutions will, within 90 days of publication of this notice,
apply to the High Court under section 48 of POCA for an order declaring the property forfeit to the state. The order
will remain in force until the application for a forfeiture order is finalised, and until any forfeiture order that is made
is satisfied.
4 If you intend to oppose the application for a forfeiture order, or you intend to apply for an order excluding your
interest from a forfeiture order in respect of the property, you must enter an appearance in terms of the order. The
requirements for such an appearance are set out in the order and are also dealt with in sections 39(3), (4) and (5)
of the POCA. An appearance must comply with these requirements.
5 Your attention is specifically drawn to the 14-day time limit prescribed in section 39(4) for the entry of an
appearance referred to in paragraph 4 above.
6 If you enter an appearance in terms of the order you will be entitled to be given 14 days notice of the application
by the applicant for a forfeiture order in respect of the property.
7 If you fail to enter an appearance in terms of the order or to comply with the above requirements, you will not
be given notice of the application for a forfeiture order and you will not be entitled to appear at the hearing of the
application. In such a case, the court may grant a default order forfeiting the property to the state under section 53
of POCA.
8 You may, on good cause shown (including the non-availability of any other suitable remedy to protect your
legitimate rights or interests), on 3 days notice in urgent instances and at least 7 days notice in other instances to
the applicant, and within 8 days of becoming aware of the order, apply for reconsideration of the order.
9 You are specifically advised that even if you intend to apply for reconsideration of the preservation order in this
case, you must, in addition, comply with paragraphs 4 and 5 above if you intend to oppose the forfeiture application
at a later date. Failure to do so can result in a forfeiture order being granted against the property by default and
without further notice to you.
10 Whenever this order states that you must deliver or serve any notice, affidavit or other process document on
the applicant, you must deliver or serve them on the applicant at the following address:
The State Attorney
Applicant's Attorneys
11th floor
Fedsure Building
49 Charlotte Maxeke Street
BLOEMFONTEIN
Tel: 051 400 4300
This gazette is also available free online at www.gpwonline.co.za
STAATSKOERANT, 17 Maart 2023 No. 48204 29
Any correspondence or other enquiries must also be directed to this address or contact number.
----------oo0oo----------
Case No: 5521/2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
(Mpumalanga Division, Mbombela (Main seat))
Mbombela, 2023-02-27, Honourable Judge Kgoele
In the matter between: Micromatica 771 (Pty) Ltd, Applicant, and Litsemba 452 Investments CC,
Respondent
Having heard counsel and having read the papers, the following order is hereby made:
1. That Litsemba 452 Investments CC (registration number 2001/010280/23) is hereby placed under provisional
winding up.
2. That a rule nisi do hereby issue calling on any interested parties to show cause on 3 April 2023 at 10am or so
soon as this matter may be heard why a final liquidation order should not be granted.
3. That a copy of this order be forthwith served on the Respondent at its domicilium citandi et executandi and
registered office and be published in the Government Gazette and in the Daily Newspaper.
4. A copy of this order be served on the Employees and/or Trade Union (if any) of the Respondent.
5. A copy of this order be served on the Master of the High Court Mpumalanga.
6. A copy of this order be served on the South African Revenue Services.
----------oo0oo----------
Case No: 2022/035923
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
(NORTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT, Pretoria)
Pretoria, 2023-01-31, Madam Justice Van der Schyff J
In the matter between: Birgitta Ann-Charlott Svensson (Identity Number: 620123 0290 18 9), Applicant,
and Pilot IT (Pty) Ltd (Registration Number:2019/486388/07), Respondent
After having read the papers and having heard Counsel for the Applicant, it is ordered that:
1. The Respondent is placed in provisional liquidation as of from date of this order, with return date being 3 May
2023 as determined by the above mentioned Honourable Court, at which date all persons and/or parties interested
must show cause, if any, why the Respondent should not be placed under final liquidation;
----------oo0oo----------
Case No: UM29/2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
(NORTH WEST DIVISION, MAHIKENG)
MAHIKENG, 2023-02-23, HONOURABLE JUSTICE DJAJE, DJP
In the matter between: RUAN BOTES, JEANDRE VILJOEN, Applicant, and TARIOMIX (PTY) LTD
(REG NO: 2011/119689/07) FINANCIAL SECTOR CONDUCT AUTHORITY, Respondent
In re: For the liquidation of TARIOMIX (PTY) LTD.
ON THE 23rd OF FEBRUARY 2023, BEFORE THE HONOURABLE MADAM JUSTICE DJAJE DJP
Having heard Adv E Labuschagne SC and Adv H van Staden on behalf of the Applicants and Adv Pistor
SC on behalf of the First Respondent and having read the Notice of Motion and other documents filed of record;
This gazette is also available free online at www.gpwonline.co.za
30 No. 48204 GOVERNMENT GAZETTE, 17 March 2023