Lebogang Mabeo
Court order seizes property linked to crime · Published 2024-07-12 · What is a POCA?
- Party
- Lebogang Mabeo
- ID / Reg no
- 2007/004396/07
- Date
- 2024-06-25
Case
- Case number
- 1035/2024
- Court
- East London Circuit Court
Parties addressed
- Lebogang Mabeo
Asset description
The credit balance, including interest, in Nedbank Bank account number 1282600729 which is the proceeds of unlawful activities. (a copy of which can be obtained from the person motioned in par 9 hereunder.) .
Identifiers
- Company regs
- 2007/004396/07, 2008/246288/23
From the gazette
Case No: 1035/2024
Docex: 041-585 7921
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
(Eastern Cape Division, East London Circuit Court)
East London, 2024-06-25, Before Justice Norman
In the ex parte application of: The National Director of Public Prosecutions, Applicant
In re: I: In relation: Re: The credit balance, including interest, in Nedbank Bank account number 1282600729
which is the proceeds of unlawful activities
annexure a
NOTICE IN TERMS OF SECTION 39 OF THE PREVENTION OF ORGANISED CRIME ACT 121 OF 1998 (POCA)
The National Director of Public Prosecutions obtained a preservation of property order in the High Court of South Africa
(East London Circuit Court) on 25 June 2024 in case number 1035/2024 in relation to: The credit balance, including
interest, in Nedbank Bank account number 1282600729 which is the proceeds of unlawful activities. (a copy of which
can be obtained from the person motioned in par 9 hereunder.)
.
This notice is addressed to Lebogang Mabeo and all other persons who may have an interest in the property described
above.
Take notice that:
1 If you have an interest in the property, you should understand that it is now at risk. You are advised to obtain legal
advice on whether your interest can be protected and, if so, on how to protect it.
2 You are notified that the National Director will, within 90 days of publication of this notice, apply to the High Court
under section 48 of the POCA for a forfeiture order. The preservation order will remain in force until the application for
a forfeiture order is finalised, and until any forfeiture order that is made is satisfied.
3 If you intend to oppose the application for a forfeiture order, or you intend to apply for an order excluding your interest
from a forfeiture order in respect of the property, you must enter an appearance in terms of the order. The requirements
for such an appearance are set out in the order and are also dealt with in sections 39(3), (4) and (5) of the POCA. An
appearance must comply with these requirements.
4 Your attention is specifically drawn to the 14-day time limit prescribed in section 39(4) for the entry of an appearance
referred to in paragraph 3 above.
5 If you enter an appearance in terms of the order you will be entitled to be given 14 days notice of the application by
the applicant for a forfeiture order in respect of the property.
6 If you fail to enter an appearance in terms of the order or to comply with the above requirements, you will not be given
notice of the application for a forfeiture order and you will not be entitled to appear at the hearing of the application. In
such a case, the court may grant a default order forfeiting the property to the state under section 53 of the POCA.
7 You may, on good cause shown (including the non-availability of any other suitable remedy to protect your legitimate
rights or interests), on 3 days notice in urgent instances and at least 7 days notice in other instances to the applicant,
and within 8 days of becoming aware of the order, apply for reconsideration of the order.
8 You are specifically advised that even if you intend to apply for reconsideration of the preservation order in this case,
you must, in addition, comply with paragraphs 4 and 5 above if you intend to oppose the forfeiture application at a later
date. Failure to do so can result in a forfeiture order being granted against the property by default and without further
notice to you.
9 Whenever this order states that you must deliver or serve any notice, affidavit or other process document on the
applicant, you must deliver or serve them on the applicant at the following address:
STATE ATTORNEY EAST LONDON// BHISHO, 17 Fleet Street East London. Asanda Sakasa. ASakasa@ npa.gov.za
Case No: 2478/2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
(LIMPOPO DIVISION, POLOKWANE)
POLOKWANE, 2024-05-14, BEFORE THE HONOURABLE: ACTING JUDGE DEANE
In the matter between: Elegant Fuel (Pty) Ltd (Registration number: 2007/004396/07), Applicant and Sovenga
Filling Station CC (Registration number: 2008/246288/23), Respondent
Having considered the documents filed of record and having heard counsel:
1. The Respondent is hereby provisionally wound-up and placed in the hands of the Master of the High Court;
This gazette is also available free online at www.gpwonline.co.za
STAATSKOERANT, 12 Julie 2024 No. 50920 23
2. A rule nisi is hereby issued calling upon all persons concerned to appear to show cause, if any, to this Court at 10h00
on 25 July 2024 why the Respondent should not be finally wound up and placed in the hand of the Master of the High
Court;
3. The cost of the application should be vosts in the administration of the Respondent estate.
Case No: 2478/2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
(LIMPOPO DIVISION, POLOKWANE)
POLOKWANE, 2024-05-14, BEFORE THE HONOURABLE: ACTING JUDGE DEANE
In the matter between: Elegant Fuel (Pty) Ltd (Registration number: 2007/004396/07), Applicant and Sovenga
Filling Station CC (Registration number: 2008/246288/23), Respondent
Having considered the documents filed of record and having heard counsel:
1. The Respondent is hereby provisionally wound-up and placed in the hands of the Master of the High Court;
2. A rule nisi is hereby issued calling upon all persons concerned to appear to show cause, if any, to this Court at 10h00
on 25 July 2024 why the Respondent should not be finally wound up and placed in the hand of the Master of the High
Court;
3. The cost of the application should be vosts in the administration of the Respondent estate.
Case No: 1401/2024
Docex: 043 722 4210
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
(Eastern Cape Division, Mthatha)
Mthatha, 2024-06-21, Before the Honourable Madam Justice Pakati
In the matter between: Garth Merrick Voigt N.O, First Applicant and Nurjehan Abdool Gevaar Omar N.O
Second Applicant and Tyl Jay Hanneman, Respondent
Having considered the documents filed of record and hearing Mr Hobbs, Counsel the Applicants: -
1. The order of this court granted on 28 May 2024 is hereby varied to read as follows.
2. The Estate of the Respondent is hereby placed under provisional Sequestration in the hands of the Master of the
High Court Mthatha.
3. A Rule Nisi issues calling upon the Respondent and any other interested party, to show cause if any on 30 July 2024
at 09h30, as to why:
3.1 the provisional sequestration order should not be made final; and
3.2 the costs of this application should not be the costs in the sequestration.
4. The Applicant is required to cause [at least one week before the return date of the Rule Nisi].
4.1 the publication of this order once in the Daily Dispatch Newspaper and once in the Government Gazette;
4.2 this order be served by registered mail upon all known creditors of the respondent having a claim in excess of R25
000.00;
4.3 this order be served upon the South African Revenue Services by way of electronic mail;
4.4 this order be served upon the respondent at his place of residence.
5. the costs of the hearing of 28 May 2024 are reserved and there shall be no order as to today's costs.
This gazette is also available free online at www.gpwonline.co.za
24 No. 50920 GOVERNMENT GAZETTE, 12 July 2024